Also found no relationship between the students involved fighting and drug abuse. It is precisely to escape the fighting, a student must have a high awareness and vigilance and excellent physical condition. Mustapha and Winarini research showed no convincing evidence, individually, the students involved have personal characteristics and backgrounds of the students who brawl. According to them, the hostility that dominated brawl situation must be understood within the framework of a very small group dynamics related to the characteristics of individual members of the group brawl.
Thus, theories that try to connect students involved in brawl came from a family that is not harmonious myth wrong. Winarini (1998) proved, both the students involved and do not claim to have a close relationship with her parents.
Opinions expressed poor quality schools and low discipline often involved fighting is also not entirely true. In reality (Bulungan case), the involvement of the school's top academic belong in the fight quite high and dangerous in the sense of resulting in death. Winarini also see the brawl had nothing to do with the level of intelligence and academic achievement. Many bright students are also involved. Savvy students did have a contribution on strategies or evacuation (rescue) himself and his friends.
Fighting and Vigilantism
It's time to fight juvenile delinquency is no longer considered unusual. Promote violent behavior, until September 2012, has caused 14 deaths (plus victims Manggarai). Collective violence has been an unlawful behavior.
Referring to Freud's theory, the possibility of actors do not hesitate to kill his opponent is a manifestation of aggressive instincts. This encourages human instinct destroy another human being, in the form of aggressive behavior that contains hate, marked satisfaction gained as opposed to suffering, injury, or death, and that gives satisfaction to see the opponent failed to achieve the desired object.
There is a difference of perception. Students assume mischief done only a symbolic manifestation of their aspirations because it is often treated unfairly. They are trying to identify themselves as adolescents differ from those around him, in school, on the street, even in public. It's a way to promote themselves, and when they met with friends, they then form a kinship groups. Instead, people tend to think of this behavior as a crime and prosecute criminal sanctions imposed. However, an act of aggression categorized violence is highly influenced by situational and motivational measures. In criminology had no explanation when called deviant acts of violence and crime when it is considered pure. The classification depends on whether it is behavior that has become the character of the offender and whether in a similar situation will be repeated or not.
Student brawls seem like symptoms of thuggery. These cultures tend to be grassroots. Narrowness of employment, economic crisis and inequality striking, pushing them to the periphery 'frustrations. At high levels of marginalization, they potentially deviant or criminal acts to meet the need. Today, the behavior of students involved in brawls imitate thugs cultural values, such as the recognition of the status of the search showed toughness, courage and recklessness.
Students tend to think of fighting as a way of gaining recognition and high status and respected within the group. The higher the intensity and frequency in the fight (breaking the law) and the more severe violations of the law by the beating or torture, the higher prestige and status. Culture of thuggery that emulated next myth toughness and bravery. At this value, which is seen is of physical prowess, marked strength to bear the blow, receiving damage, up to the police and others intimidated when caught due to brawl, and courage do something risky and reckless.
Post a Comment